Been fortunate enough to record and watch todays proceedings and am flabbergasted by the following :
1) The documentary clips on various aspects of the case are tremendously biased if one considers the tenor of the questioning and music chosen with the clear intention to cast doubt on his version .
2) The cutting of certain scenes when interviewng well known criminal defence attorneys such as William de Grass and William Booth makes them looking like bumbling buffoons which I can ensure you is not the case both being exceedingly erudite.
3) Surely this is not good for Oscar's right to a fair trial seeing as how unless she is insulated in a cocoon the presiding Judge will be bombarded with some many opinions it cannot but influence her view of the parties to some degree and I expect her to mention this in judgement at some stage .
Interesting times
1) The documentary clips on various aspects of the case are tremendously biased if one considers the tenor of the questioning and music chosen with the clear intention to cast doubt on his version .
2) The cutting of certain scenes when interviewng well known criminal defence attorneys such as William de Grass and William Booth makes them looking like bumbling buffoons which I can ensure you is not the case both being exceedingly erudite.
3) Surely this is not good for Oscar's right to a fair trial seeing as how unless she is insulated in a cocoon the presiding Judge will be bombarded with some many opinions it cannot but influence her view of the parties to some degree and I expect her to mention this in judgement at some stage .
Interesting times